Increasing the conversion accuracy of model gas (Ar) consumption into xenon consumption when using capillary tubes in the working substance feed systems of electric propulsion
1Yurkov, BV, 1Petrenko, OM, 2Asmolovskyi, SYu., 1Voronovskyi, DK, 3Kulagin, SM 1Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro, Ukraine; Space Electric Thruster Systems, Dnipro, Ukraine 2Space Electric Thruster Systems, Dnipro, Ukraine 3Institute of Technical Mechanics of the NAS and SSA of Ukraine, Dnipro, Ukraine |
Space Sci. & Technol. 2023, 29 ;(5):051-059 |
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2023.05.051 |
Publication Language: Ukrainian |
Abstract: The article discusses the possibility of improving the method of converting the mass flow rate of the model gas (Ar) to the mass flow rate of the working gas (Xe) in capillary tubes. The well-known method of such conversion, which is used in electric propulsion systems, is based on Poiseuille's law for laminar flow. The results of the experimental verification of the method showed the accuracy from -21% to 30%. On the basis of the conducted experimental studies, it was proposed to enter a correction factor depending on the inner diameter of the capillary into the existing methodology of mass flow recalculation, which made it possible to significantly reduce the error of recalculation of Ar mass flow rate into Xe mass flow rate to ±4%.
Increasing the accuracy of the calculation allows the wide use of argon model gas in the selection of capillary flow restrictors for feed systems of low- and medium-power electric propulsion systems and during testing of assembled systems at various stages of development and testing.
|
Keywords: capillary throttle, electric propulsion system, model gas, recalculation of mass flow rates of the working substance, working gas, xenon feed system |
1. Sanin F. P., Dzhur Ye. O., Kuchma L. D., Najd'onov V. A. (1995). Hermetychnist' u raketno-kosmichnij tekhnitsi. Pidruchnyk. Dnipropetrovs'k: Edition DDU, 168 p. [in Ukrainian].
2. Alicat Scientific. Correcting flow data after choosing the wrong gas in Gas Select™ (2023).
URL: https://www.alicat.com/using-your-alicat/how-to-correct-flow-data-after-... (Last accessed: 09.01.2023).
3. Bronkhorst High-Tech B. V. About Fluidat® on the net v1.85.
URL: https://www.fluidat.com/default.asp (Last accessed: 09.01.2023).
4. Brooks Instrument. Gas Correction Factors. URL: https://www.brooksinstrument.com/en/resources /sizing-tools (Last accessed: 09.01.2023).
5. Chang-Bin Guan, Yan Shen, Zhao-Pu Yao, Zhao-Li Wang, Mei-Jie Zhang, Ke Nan, Huan-Huan Hui (2019). Design, Simulation, and Experiment of an LTCC-Based Xenon Micro Flow Control Device for an Electric Propulsion System. Processes MDPI, 7, 862.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7110862
6. Hardy J. E., Hylton J. O., McKnight T. E. (1999). Empirical correlations for thermal flowmeters covering a wide range of thermal-physical properties. Nat. Conf. Standards Labs (NCSL).
7. Jackson J., Cassady J., Allen M., Myers R., Tofil T., Herman D., Pencil E. (2018). Development of High Power Hall Thruster Systems to Enable the NASA Exploration. 6th Int. Conf. Space Propulsion, SP2018_00429.
8. Jeongjae Lee, Deok Hyeon Kim, Jae Cheong Lee, Sangyoung So, Younho Kim, Youngwook Sirl, Miso Son, Dong yeol Shin, Hosung Yoon (2022). Development of Compact Xenon Feeding Unit for 100W Class Hall Effect Propulsion System. 8th Int. Conf. Space Propulsion, SP2022_069.
9. Kinefuchi K., Cho S., Tsukizaki R. (2020). Characterization of a Capillary Flow Controller. J. propulsion and power. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B37726
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B37726
10. Lee D., Kim H., Lee S., Doh G., Choe W. (2019). Development and Performance Test of a 50 W-class Hall Thruster. 36th Int. Electric Propulsion Conf., IEPC-2019-599.
11. Lev D., Eytan R., Alon G., Warshavsky A., Appel L., Kapulkin A., Rubanovych M. (2016). The Development of CAM200 - Low Power Hall Thruster. Trans. Jap. Soc. Aeronautical and Space Sci. Aerospace Technology Jap., 14, № ists30, Pb_217-Pb_223.
https://doi.org/10.2322/tastj.14.Pb_217
12. Petrenko O., Voronovskyi D., Yurkov B., Tolok S., Kulagin S. (2021). Hall Thruster ST-25 Developed by Space Electric Thruster Systems (SETS). 7th Int. Conf. Space Propulsion, SP2020_00266.
13. Potrivitu G.-C., Sun Y., Rohaizat M. W. A. B., Cherkun O., Xu L., Huang S., Xu S. (2020). Review of Low-Power Electric Propulsion Research at the Space Propulsion Centre Singapore. Aerospace MDPI, 7, № 6, 67.
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7060067
14. Sashi Kumar GN, Mahendra AK, Gouthaman G. (2012). Understanding the Compatibility of Thermal Mass Flow Meter with Various Process Gases. J. Chemical Engineering & Process Technology, S1:002.
https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7048.S1-002
15. Stanford Research Systems. Gas Correction Factors for Bayard-Alpert Ionization Gauges.
URL: https://www.thinksrs.com/downloads/pdfs/applicationnotes/IG1BAgasapp.pdf (Last accessed: 09.01.2023).
16. Younho Kim, Seongmin Kang, Yunhwang Jeong, Jongho Seon, Junghyun wee, Hoseong Yoon, Jongsub Lee, Mihui Seo, Wonho Choi (2009). Development of Xenon feed system for a 300-W Hall-Thruster. 31st Int. Electric Propulsion Conf., IEPC-2009-061.
17. Yurkov B., Petrenko O., Voronovsky D., Troyan A. (2021). Test Results of a High-Speed Solenoid Valve for the Electric Propulsion Feed System. Visnyk DNU, 29, Vup. 24, 72-80.
https://doi.org/10.15421/452107