Ionospheric total electron content variations caused by the Tonga volcano explosion of January 15, 2022

1Chernogor, LF
1V.N. Karazin National University of Kharkiv, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Space Sci. & Technol. 2023, 29 ;(3):67-87
https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2023.03.067
Язык публикации: Ukrainian
Аннотация: 
The capability of volcanoes to generate powerful explosive eruptions influencing the state of the ionosphere became known back in the 1980th. The Hunga-Tonga-Hunga-Ha’apai (Tonga for short) volcano explosion on January 15, 2022, has shown a surge of renewed interest in investigating effects in the Earth–atmosphere–ionosphere–magnetosphere system since this volcano can be rightfully classified as unique. A number of papers have already dealt with the ionospheric effects generated by the Tonga volcano.
       The temporal variations in the total electron content (TEC) were used to determine the number of volcano explosions to be five. The second and third explosions were the strongest, with the second being the most intense. The response of the ionosphere to the Tonga volcano explosion has been studied on local and global scales by making use of the Global Positioning System satellite constellation and measurements onboard the Swarm satellite network. In the vicinity of the volcano explosion, disturbances in TEC attained 5–10 TECU. In addition to the local effect, traveling ionospheric disturbances were observed to propagate, which were due to the generation and propagation of atmospheric gravity waves with speeds of 180 m/s to 1,050 m/s. Of particular importance to global-scale perturbations is the Lamb wave, which propagated with a speed of 315 m/s. At nighttime, plasma depletions of the equatorial ionosphere were revealed over the tropical Pacific Ocean when the electron density at 400–500 km altitude showed a decrease by 2–3 orders of magnitude. The length of these formations in longitude exceeded ~10 Mm, and they were observed for more than 4–5 h.
       The scientific objective of this study is further analysis of aperiodic and quasi-periodic perturbations in the ionosphere, which were caused by the Tonga volcano explosion, in a wide range of distances from the source of disturbance (from ~0.1 Mm to 5 Mm). To reveal the ionospheric response to the Tonga volcano explosion, the records of signals from Global Positioning System satellites have been analyzed. The intercomparison of temporal variations in TEC observed on the reference days and on the day when the volcano explosion occurred has resulted in the determination of basic principles of the generation of ionospheric perturbations and the estimation of numerical magnitudes of the parameters of the perturbations. Four groups of disturbances have been detected, each of which arrived at different time delays with respect to the moment of the volcano explosion. It is important to note that the time delay increases with increasing distance from the volcano to the observational instruments. The first group of speeds included the disturbances traveling with a speed close to 1,000 m/s and having an N-shaped profile. This perturbation was generated by a blast wave whose speed depended on the excess pressure and a priori exceeded the speed of sound. In the second group, the speed varied in the 336 m/s to 500 m/s range, within which the speeds of atmospheric gravity waves are found. The speeds in the third group exhibited variability within the 260–318 m/s limits, within which the Lamb wave propagates. The speed in the fourth group was estimated to be 190–220 m/s, which is a characteristic speed of the tsunami that was caused directly by the volcano explosion. The period of quasi-periodic perturbations varied from ~10 min to 20 min, while their amplitudes were from 0.5 TECU to 1 TECU.
       The observed ionospheric «hole» was proved to be produced by the volcano explosion directly, with the modules of the absolute and relative magnitudes of disturbances showing a tendency for decreasing with increasing distance from the explosion epicenter, from ~10 TECU to 2 TECU and from 37 % to 7 %, respectively. Contrary to the amplitude, the «hole» time delay and its duration exhibited an increase with distance from the volcano to the observational sensors, from 35 min to 100 min and from ~ 30–40 min to 120–150 min, respectively. A mechanism for generating the ionospheric «hole» has been advanced, which is based on both the electric and non-electric processes (cracking, the friction of particles, condensation of water vapor, coagulation of water droplets, attachment of electrons, gravity segregation, etc.). The ionospheric «hole» is formed as a result of perturbing the global electric circuit, arising external electric currents, an increase in the electric field strengths by orders of magnitude in the atmosphere and the ionosphere, diffusion of the ionospheric plasma down to lower altitudes where the recombination processes become fast.
       The basic numerical characteristics have been established of the disturbances, whose fluctuations account for local time, the dusk terminator, sensor geographic locations, the location of subionospheric points on the satellite to receiver ray paths with respect to the equatorial anomaly, etc.
Ключевые слова: disturbance parameters, ionosphere, ionospheric «hole», Tonga volcano, total electron content, volcano explosion, wave disturbances
References: 
1. Chernogor L. F. (2012). Physics and ecology of the catastrophes. (Kharkiv, Ukraine: V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Publ.) [In Russian].
2. Chernogor L. F. Physical effects of the January 15, 2022, powerful Tonga volcano explosion in the Earth-atmosphere-ionosphere-magnetosphere system. [In Ukrainian]. [In press].
3. Chernogor L. F., Shevelev M. B. A statistical study of the explosive waves launched by the Tonga super-volcano on January 15, 2022. Space science and technology. [In Ukrainian]. [In press].
4. Aa E., Zhang S.-R., Erickson P. J., Vierinen J., Coster A. J., Goncharenko L. P., Spicher A., Rideout W. (2022). Significant Ionospheric Hole and Equatorial Plasma Bubbles After the 2022 Tonga Volcano Eruption. Space Weather. 20(7). id:e2022SW003101.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003101
5. Aa E., Zhang S.-R., Wang W., Erickson P. J., Qian L., Eastes R., Harding B. J., Immel T. J., Karan D. K., Daniell R. E., Coster A. J., Goncharenko L. P., Vierinen J., Cai X., Spicher A. (2022). Pronounced Suppression and X-Pattern Merging of Equatorial Ionization Anomalies After the 2022 Tonga Volcano Eruption. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 127(6). id:e2022JA030527.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030527
6. Adushkin V. V., Rybnov Y. S., Spivak A. A. (2022). Wave-Related, Electrical, and Magnetic Effects Due to the January 15, 2022 Catastrophic Eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Volcano. J. Volcanolog. Seismol. 16(4). P. 251-263.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0742046322040029
7. Amores A., Monserrat S., Marcos M., Argüeso D., Villalonga J., Jordà G., Gomis D. (2022). Numerical Simulation of Atmospheric Lamb Waves Generated by the 2022 Hunga-Tonga Volcanic Eruption. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(6). id:e2022GL098240.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098240
8. Astafyeva E., Maletckii B., Mikesell T. D., Munaibari E., Ravanelli M., Coisson P., Manta F., Rolland L. (2022). The 15 January 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption history as inferred from ionospheric observations. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(10). id:e2022GL098827.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098827
9. Burt S. (2022). Multiple airwaves crossing Britain and Ireland following the eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai on 15 January 2022. Weather. Special Issue: The January 2022 eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai. 77(3). P. 76-81.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.4182
10. Carr J. L., Horváth Á., Wu D. L., Friberg M. D. (2022). Stereo plume height and motion retrievals for the record-setting Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai eruption of 15 January 2022. Geophysical Research Letters. 49. id:e2022GL098131.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098131
11. Carvajal M., Sepúlveda I., Gubler A., Garreaud R. (2022). Worldwide signature of the 2022 Tonga volcanic tsunami. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(6). id:e2022GL098153.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098153
12. Chen C.-H., Zhang X., Sun Y.-Y., Wang F., Liu T.-C., Lin C.-Y., Gao Y., Lyu J., Jin X., Zhao X., Cheng X., Zhang P., Chen Q., Zhang D., Mao Z., Liu J.-Y. (2022). Individual Wave Propagations in Ionosphere and Troposphere Triggered by the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Underwater Volcano Eruption on 15 January 2022. Remote Sensing. 14(9). id:2179.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092179
13. Cheng K., Huang Y.-N. (1992). Ionospheric disturbances observed during the period of Mount Pinatubo eruptions in June 1991. J. Geophys. Res. 97(A11). P. 16995-17004,
https://doi.org/10.1029/92JA01462
14. Chernogor L. F. (2022). Effects of the Tonga volcano explosion on January 15, 2022. International Conference "Astronomy and Space Physics in the Kyiv University" in part of the World Science Day for Peace and Development. October 18 - 21. Kyiv, Ukraine. Book of Abstracts. P. 12-13.
https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580141
15. Chernogor L. F. (2022). Electrical Effects of the Tonga Volcano Unique Explosion on January 15, 2022. International Conference "Astronomy and Space Physics in the Kyiv University" in part of the World Science Day for Peace and Development. October 18 - 21. Kyiv, Ukraine. Book of Abstracts. P. 79-80.
https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580141
16. Chernogor L. F. (2022). Magnetospheric Effects That Accompanied the Explosion of the Tonga Volcano on January 15, 2022. International Conference "Astronomy and Space Physics in the Kyiv University" in part of the World Science Day for Peace and Development. October 18 - 21. Kyiv, Ukraine. Book of Abstracts. P. 81-82.
17. Chernogor L. F. (2022). Magnetic Effects of the Unique Explosion of the Tonga Volcano. International Conference "Astronomy and Space Physics in the Kyiv University" in part of the World Science Day for Peace and Development. October 18 - 21. Kyiv, Ukraine. Book of Abstracts. P. 89-90.
18. Chernogor L. F. (2022). The Tonga super-volcano explosion as a subject of applied physics. International Scientific Conference "Electronics and Applied Physics", APHYS 2022. 18 - 22 October. Kyiv, Ukraine. P. 130-131.
19. Chernogor L. F, Mylovanov Y. B., Dorohov V. L. (2022). Ionospheric Effects accompanying the January 15, 2022 Tonga Volcano Explosion. International Conference "Astronomy and Space Physics in the Kyiv University" in part of the World Science Day for Peace and Development. October 18 - 21. Kyiv, Ukraine. Book of Abstracts. P. 83-84.
20. Chernogor L. F, Shevelev M. B. (2022). Statistical characteristics of atmospheric waves, generated by the explosion of the Tonga volcano on January 15, 2022. International Conference "Astronomy and Space Physics in the Kyiv University" in part of the World Science Day for Peace and Development. October 18 - 21. Kyiv, Ukraine. Book of Abstracts. P. 85-86.
21. Dautermann T., Calais E., Mattioli G. S. (2009). Global Positioning System detection and energy estimation of the ionospheric wave caused by the 13 July 2003 explosion of the Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat. J. Geophys. Res. 114. id:B02202.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005722
22. Dautermann T., Calais E., Lognonn'e P., Mattioli G. (2009). Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling after the 2003 Explosive eruption of the Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat. Geophys. J. Int. 179. P. 1537-1546.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04390.x
23. Ern M., Hoffmann L., Rhode S., Preusse P. (2022). The mesoscale gravity wave response to the 2022 Tonga volcanic eruption: AIRS and MLS satellite observations and source backtracing. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(10). id:e2022GL098626.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098626
24. Harding B. J., Wu Y.-J. J., Alken P., Yamazaki Y., Triplett C. C., Immel T. J., Gasque L. C., Mende S. B., Xiong C. (2022). Impacts of the January 2022 Tonga Volcanic Eruption on the Ionospheric Dynamo: ICON-MIGHTI and Swarm Observations of Extreme Neutral Winds and Currents. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(9). id:e2022GL098577.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098577
25. Heidarzadeh M., Gusman A. R., Ishibe T., Sabeti R., Šepić J. (2022). Estimating the eruption-induced water displacement source of the 15 January 2022 Tonga volcanic tsunami from tsunami spectra and numerical modelling. Ocean Engineering. 261. id:112165.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112165
26. Heki K. (2006). Explosion energy of the 2004 eruption of the Asama Volcano, central Japan, inferred from ionospheric disturbances. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33. id:L14303.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026249
27. Igarashi K., Kainuma S., Nishimuta I., Okamoto S., Kuroiwa H., Tanaka T., Ogawa T. (1994). Ionospheric and atmospheric disturbances around Japan caused by the eruption of Mount Pinatubo on 15 June 1991. J. Atmos. and Terr. Phys. 56(9). P. 1227-1234.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(94)90060-4
28. Imamura F., Suppasri A., Arikawa T., Koshimura S., Satake K., Tanioka Y. (2022). Preliminary Observations and Impact in Japan of the Tsunami Caused by the Tonga Volcanic Eruption on January 15, 2022. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 179. P. 1549-1560.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-03058-0
29. Inan U. S., Piddyachiy D., Peter W. B., Sauvaud J. A., Parrot M. (2007). DEMETER satellite observations of lightning-induced electron precipitation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34. id:L07103.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL029238
30. Johnson J. B. (2003). Generation and propagation of infrasonic airwaves from volcanic explosions. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 121(1-2). P. 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(02)00408-0
31. Kubota T., Saito T., Nishida K. (2022). Global fast-traveling tsunamis driven by atmospheric Lamb waves on the 2022 Tonga eruption. Science. 377(6601). P. 91-94.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4364
32. Kulichkov S. N., Chunchuzov I. P., Popov O. E., Gorchakov G. I., Mishenin A. A., Perepelkin V. G., Bush G. A., Skorokhod A. I., Vinogradov Yu. A., Semutnikova E. G., Šepic J., Medvedev I. P., Gushchin R. A., Kopeikin V. M., Belikov I. B., Gubanova D. P., Karpov A. V., Tikhonov A. V. (2022). Acoustic-Gravity Lamb Waves from the Eruption of the Hunga-Tonga-Hunga-Hapai Volcano, Its Energy Release and Impact on Aerosol Concentrations and Tsunami. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 179. P. 1533-1548.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-03046-4
33. Le G., Liu G., Yizengaw E., Englert C. R. (2022). Intense equatorial electrojet and counter electrojet caused by the 15 January 2022 Tonga volcanic eruption: Space- and ground-based observations. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(11). id:e2022GL099002.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099002
34. Lin J.-T., Rajesh P. K., Lin C. C. H., Chou M.-Y., Liu J.-Y., Yue J., Hsiao T.-Y., Tsai H.-F., Chao H.-M., Kung M.-M. (2022). Rapid Conjugate Appearance of the Giant Ionospheric Lamb Wave Signatures in the Northern Hemisphere After Hunga-Tonga Volcano Eruptions. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(8). id:e2022GL098222.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098222
35. Liu C. H., Klostermeyer J., Yeh K. C., Jones T. B., Robinson T., Holt O., Leitinger R., Ogawa T., Sinno K., Kato S., Ogawa T., Bedard A. J., Kersley L. (1982). Global dynamic responses of the atmosphere to the eruption of Mount St. Helens on May 18, 1980. J. Geophys. Res. 87(A8). P. 6281-6290.
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA08p06281
36. Lynett P. (2022). The Tsunamis Generated by the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Volcano on January 15, 2022. 16 March, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square.
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1377508/v1
37. Lynett P., McCann M., Zhou Z. et al. (2022). Diverse tsunamigenesis triggered by the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai eruption. Nature. 609. P. 728-733.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05170-6
38. Matoza R. S., Fee D., Assink J. D. et al. (2022). Atmospheric waves and global seismoacoustic observations of the January 2022 Hunga eruption, Tonga. Science. 377(6601). P. 95-100.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo7063
39. Matoza R. S., Fee D., Assink J. D. et al. (2022). Supplementary Materials for Atmospheric waves and global seismoacoustic observations of the January 2022 Hunga eruption, Tonga. Science. 377(6601).
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo7063
40. Nakashima Y., Heki K., Takeo A., Cahyadi M. N., Aditiya A., Yoshizawa K. (2016). Atmospheric resonant oscillations by the 2014 eruption of the Kelud volcano, Indonesia, observed with the ionospheric total electron contents and seismic signals. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 434. P. 112-116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.11.029
41. Otsuka S. (2022). Visualizing Lamb waves from a volcanic eruption using meteorological satellite Himawari-8. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(8). id:e2022GL098324.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098324
42. Poli P., Shapiro N. M. (2022). Rapid Characterization of Large Volcanic Eruptions: Measuring the Impulse of the Hunga Tonga Ha'apai Explosion From Teleseismic Waves. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(8). id: e2022GL098123
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098123
43. Rajesh P. K., Lin C. C. H., Lin J. T., Lin C. Y., Liu J. Y., Matsuo T., et al. (2022). Extreme poleward expanding super plasma bubbles over Asia-Pacific region triggered by Tonga volcano eruption during the recovery-phase of geomagnetic storm. Geophysical Research Letters. 49. id:e2022GL099798.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099798
44. Ramírez-Herrera M. T., Coca O., Vargas-Espinosa V. (2022). Tsunami Effects on the Coast of Mexico by the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Volcano Eruption, Tonga. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 179. P. 1117-1137.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-03017-9
45. Roberts D. H., Klobuchar J. A., Fougere P. F., Hendrickson D. H. (1982). A large-amplitude traveling ionospheric disturbance produced by the May 18, 1980, explosion of Mount St. Helens. J. Geophys. Res. 87(A8). P. 6291-6301.
https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA08p06291
46. Rozhnoi A., Hayakawa M., Solovieva M., Hobara Y., Fedun V. (2014). Ionospheric effects of the Mt. Kirishima volcanic eruption as seen from subionospheric VLF observations. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics. 107. P. 54-59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.10.014
47. Saito S. (2022). Ionospheric disturbances observed over Japan following the eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai on 15 January 2022. Earth, Planets and Space. 74. id:57.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01619-0
48. Schnepf N. R., Minami T., Toh H., Nair M. C. (2022). Magnetic Signatures of the 15 January 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Volcanic Eruption. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(10). id:e2022GL098454.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098454
49. Shinagawa H., Tsugawa T., Matsumura M., Iyemori T., Saito A., Maruyama T., Jin H., Nishioka M., Otsuka, Y. (2013). Two-dimensional simulation of ionospheric variations in the vicinity of the epicenter of the Tohoku-oki earthquake on 11 March 2011. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40. P. 5009-5013.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057627
50. Shinbori A., Otsuka Y., Sori T., Nishioka M., Perwitasari S., Tsuda T., Nishitani N. (2022). Electromagnetic conjugacy of ionospheric disturbances after the 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai volcanic eruption as seen in GNSS-TEC and SuperDARN Hokkaido pair of radars observations. Earth Planets Space. 74(106).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01665-8
51. Shults K., Astafyeva E., Adourian S. (2016). Ionospheric detection and localization of volcano eruptions on the example of the April 2015 Calbuco events. J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics. 121. P. 10,303-10,315.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023382
52. Tanioka Y., Yamanaka Y., Nakagaki T. (2022). Characteristics of the deep sea tsunami excited offshore Japan due to the air wave from the 2022 Tonga eruption. Earth, Planets and Space. 74, id:61.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01614-5
53. Terry J. P., Goff J., Winspear N., Bongolan V. P., Fisher S. (2022). Tonga volcanic eruption and tsunami, January 2022: globally the most significant opportunity to observe an explosive and tsunamigenic submarine eruption since AD 1883 Krakatau. Geoscience Letters. 9. id:24.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-022-00232-z
54. The Encyclopedia of Volcanoes (Second Edition), Academic Press, 2015. 1421 p.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385938-9.00063-8
55. Themens D. R., Watson C., Žagar N., Vasylkevych S., Elvidge S., McCaffrey A., Prikryl P., Reid B., Wood A., Jayachandran P. T. (2022). Global propagation of ionospheric disturbances associated with the 2022 Tonga volcanic eruption. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(7). id:e2022GL098158.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098158
56. Vergoz J., Hupe P., Listowski C. et al. (2022). IMS observations of infrasound and acoustic-gravity waves produced by the January 2022 volcanic eruption of Hunga, Tonga: A global analysis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 591. id:117639.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117639
57. Witze A. (2022). Why the Tongan volcanic eruption was so shocking. Nature. 602. P. 376-378.
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00394-y
https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-022-00394-y/d41...
58. Wright C. J., Hindley N. P., Alexander M. J., et al. (2022). Surface-to-space atmospheric waves from Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai eruption. Nature.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05012-5
59. Yamazaki Y., Soares G., Matzka J. (2022). Geomagnetic Detection of the Atmospheric Acoustic Resonance at 3.8 mHz During the Hunga Tonga Eruption Event on 15 January 2022. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 127(7). id:e2022JA030540.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030540
60. Yuen D. A., Scruggs M. A., Spera F. J. et al. (2022). Under the surface: Pressure-induced planetary-scale waves, volcanic lightning, and gaseous clouds caused by the submarine eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai volcano. Earthquake Research Advances. 2(3). id:100134.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqrea.2022.100134
61. Zettergren M. D., Snively J. B., Komjathy A., Verkhoglyadova O. P. (2017). Nonlinear ionospheric responses to large-amplitude infrasonic-acoustic waves generated by undersea earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics. 122. P. 2272-2291.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023159
62. Zhang S.-R., Vierinen J., Aa E., Goncharenko L. P., Erickson P. J., Rideout W., Coster A. J., Spicher A. (2022). 2022 Tonga Volcanic Eruption Induced Global Propagation of Ionospheric Disturbances via Lamb Waves. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences. 9. id:871275.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.871275